According to the "Mirror Image" Rule, how must an offeree's acceptance correspond to the offer?

According to the "Mirror Image" Rule, how must an offeree's acceptance correspond to the offer?

• A. It can vary slightly in terms but must convey the same intent
• B. It must match the offer exactly
• C. It may omit less important details
• D. It must include additional requests

Answer: (B)

The "Mirror Image" Rule dictates that for an acceptance to be valid in a contract, it must correspond exactly to the terms of the offer made by the offeror. This means that the acceptance should not introduce any new terms or conditions; it must completely match the offer. The rationale behind this rule is to ensure that both parties are in agreement about the terms of the contract, which is foundational for a legally binding agreement. If there are any discrepancies or modifications in the acceptance, it could be considered a counteroffer rather than an acceptance. This is significant in legal contexts because a counteroffer effectively rejects the original offer, creating a new negotiation scenario rather than forming a contract based on the initial terms. Therefore, the requirement for an exact match upholds the clarity and mutual understanding necessary for enforceability in contracts.

The "Mirror Image" Rule dictates that for an acceptance to be valid in a contract, it must correspond exactly to the terms of the offer made by the offeror. This means that the acceptance should not introduce any new terms or conditions; it must completely match the offer. The rationale behind this rule is to ensure that both parties are in agreement about the terms of the contract, which is foundational for a legally binding agreement.

If there are any discrepancies or modifications in the acceptance, it could be considered a counteroffer rather than an acceptance. This is significant in legal contexts because a counteroffer effectively rejects the original offer, creating a new negotiation scenario rather than forming a contract based on the initial terms. Therefore, the requirement for an exact match upholds the clarity and mutual understanding necessary for enforceability in contracts.